Leeds v. Little
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Little from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, L, presiding, establishing a lien to the amount of $2,315.87 on rea.l property of the appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Defendant Little, being the owner of the land described in the complaint, in August, 1887, entered into a contract with defendant Stalbird for the erection of a dwelling-house on the premises. Stalbird then entered into a contract in writing (Exhibit B) with plaintiffs, by which the latter agreed “to furnish and lay the tile on the house according to the plans and specifications by L. S. Buffington, using shingle tile for the sides, and Spanish tile for roof; also finials and crestings for ridges; for the sum of $2,100. Terms, spot cash on completion of job.” The plaintiffs, claiming to have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Heckmann v. . PinkneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Woodward v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Phillip v. . GallantNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Keeler v. HerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Sipley v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Palmer v. Meriden Britannia Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.