Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Weber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Counsel for the defendant contends that it was error for the trial court to have denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The basis of such contention is that the evidence establishes as a matter of law that plaintiff did not give a proper notice to defendant of the breach of warranty within a reasonable time as required by sec. 121.49, Stats., which provides in part as follows:

“But, if, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fails to give notice to the seller of the breach of any promise or warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know, of such breach,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tegen v. ChapinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Erickson v. Westfield Milling & Electric Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Groves v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ace Engineering Co. v. West Bend Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Neas v. SiemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Barlow v. DeVilbiss CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
  5. Wilson v. TuxenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API