Schaefer v. Weber
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Counsel for the defendant contends that it was error for the trial court to have denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The basis of such contention is that the evidence establishes as a matter of law that plaintiff did not give a proper notice to defendant of the breach of warranty within a reasonable time as required by sec. 121.49, Stats., which provides in part as follows:
“But, if, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fails to give notice to the seller of the breach of any promise or warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer knows, or ought to know, of such breach,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Tegen v. ChapinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Erickson v. Westfield Milling & Electric Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Groves v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Ace Engineering Co. v. West Bend Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Neas v. SiemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Barlow v. DeVilbiss CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
- Wilson v. TuxenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.