Legal Opinion
Grier v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1976No. Civ. 36260PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Henry Grier, Michael Chuba, Donald E. Figas, and Orlin Purdue, Sr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Division 192, Amalgamated Transit Union, the labor union representing the named plaintiffs and other bus drivers employed by respondent, brought this action for declaratory relief and damages. The complaint alleged that respondent AlamedaContra Costa Transit District (hereinafter Transit District) was violating Labor Code section 2928 by requiring drivers who arrived for work late to work without pay for periods in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
- Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pinela v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Cucamongans United for Reasonale Expansion v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Work Uniform CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Contra Costa Cnty. Children & Family Servs. Bureau v. David B. (In re David B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.