In Re Work Uniform Cases
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
A public employee’s uniform is an identifying mark of distinction and a source of pride for the employee and those he or she serves. But who bears the financial burden for mandated uniforms? A number of public employees filed class action complaints against their employers 1 alleging that the failure to compensate all members of the plaintiff class for the actual cost of purchasing, replacing, cleaning and maintaining required work uniforms constituted violations of the indemnification provisions of Labor Code section 2802. 2 The trial court in these coordinated actions…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Stubbs, Overbeck & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Terminal Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Curcini v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Espejo v. Copley Press, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.