Legal Opinion

Blumberg v. Feriola

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.

This is an article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding brought to review and annul a zoning board determination which granted to the intervenor-respondent a variance to permit the extension partly into a residential district of a proposed modern A&P supermarket building. Said respondent, Silver Distributing Company of New York, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Silver), has contracted to purchase Lots 1 to 8, Block 134, which front on Riverdale Avenue in the City of Yonkers. Lots 1 to 4 are in a business district in which the proposed building is a permitted use. Lots 5 to 8 are in a residence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Hickox v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Hickox v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. 293 North Broadway Corp. v. LangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Stadden v. MacauleyNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Grac v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Blumberg v. FeriolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Blumberg v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API