Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blumberg v. City of Yonkers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1965Published

1Dissent

Bergan, J. (dissenting).

The court at Special Term determined after a full trial of the issue that plaintiffs had not established they were damaged by the city ordinance which they have succeeded in having determined invalid. The court stated “ that the plaintiffs have offered no evidence which would warrant a finding that their properties were materially damaged in pecuniary value ”.

In reversing, the Appellate Division did not state in its memorandum of decision that plaintiffs had shown they were materially damaged by the ordinance, but held, rather, that the “standing” of two of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Buckley v. FasbenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API