Legal Opinion

Stadden v. Macauley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebcy C. Stoddabt, J.

Application granted. The petitioner in seeking a variance of an area requirement is not required to show a special hardship but merely practical difficulties (Matter of Village of Bronxville v. Francis, 1 AD 2d 236, affd. 1 N Y 2d 839; see, also, Matter of Corrado v. Griffin (N. Y. L. J., Dec. 4, 1956, p. 13, col. 1), and Matter of Schaefer v. Griffin (N. Y. L. J., Dec. 4, 1956, p. 12, col. 8). Here, the property owner or his vendee may not be deprived of the right to build a dwelling on the 40 by 100 foot plot merely because the first has no *298intention of building and the second is purchasing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Bronxville v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Hickox v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. 293 North Broadway Corp. v. LangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wachsberger v. MichalisNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Feldman v. Nassau Shores Estates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Blumberg v. FeriolaNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Faranda v. SchoepflinNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Point Lookout Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API