Legal Opinion
Z4 Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 16, 2007No. 2006-1638PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, zip Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 06-cv-142, 2006 WL 2401099 (E.D.Tex. Aug. 18, 2006). The district court denied Microsoft’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) following a jury trial in which the jury found that Microsoft had infringed z4 Technologies, Inc.’s (“z4’s”) U.S. Patents No. 6,044,471 (“the '471 patent”) and No. 6,785,825 (“the '825 patent”) and had failed to prove these patents invalid, zip Techs.,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Grober v. Mako Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Cat Tech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.