Legal Opinion

Filasky v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1987No. CV-86-0237-TPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Linda Ellen Filasky (“Filasky”), was insured by defendant, Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company (“Preferred Risk”), under an automobile insurance policy and homeowner’s insurance policy. This case arises from events surrounding settlement of three claims under the two policies. All three claims were handled by Preferred Risk’s Tempe office. Throughout the handling of Filasky’s three claims, Robert Novak (“Novak”) was the claims manager, and Mike Gordon (“Gordon”) was the claims adjuster.

Filasky was injured in an automobile accident while working on June 17,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. DeChant v. Monarch Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API