Jacobosky v. Zborowjan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 4, March T., 1911, by defendant, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., March Term, 1896, No. 83, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Adelaide Jacobosky v. Joseph Zborowjan. Rule to open judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
On February 15, 1896, judgment was entered against the defendant by virtue of a confession contained in a sealed promissory note of the same date for $200, payable two years after date with interest, purporting to be executed by the defendant. By indorsement on the note, in consideration of the granting of a loan of $1,000 by a building and loan association to the defendant, the lien and collection were postponed to the lien and collection of the bond and mortgage given by the defendant to the building and loan association on the same date-for $1,000, the amount of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Schomaker v. DeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Ilyus v. BuchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Challenge Yearly Beneficial Ass'n v. WeisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- German v. ConoverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Arbuckles & Co. v. CloughleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Commonwealth v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914