Ilyus v. Buch
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 166, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., April T., 1893, No. 463, discharging rule to open judgment in case of A. C. Ilyus, Administrator d. b. n. c. t. a. of Ferdinand Utermoehi, deceased, v. Maria Buch. Rule to open judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
Mary A. Young, executrix of the last will of Ferdinand *45Utennoehl, deceased, caused judgment to be entered in the court below, on June 24, 1893, against Maria Buch, upon a judgment bond, purporting to have been executed by the defendant, which was found among the securities of the decedent. The defendant, on March 10, 1894, presented her petition to the court alleging' that her signature to the bond was a forgery, and obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened. The plaintiff, Mary A. Young, executrix, filed an answer denying the allegations of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ward v. LetzkusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Hale v. UhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Jacobosky v. ZborowjanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Zajaczkowski v. JawerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- German v. ConoverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.