Challenge Yearly Beneficial Ass'n v. Weis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 140, Oct. T., 1912, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Sept. Term, 1911, No. 4,576, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Challenge Yearly Beneficial Association v. August Weis, Principal, and Joseph Weis, Security. Rule to open judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
The single assignment of error complains of the court below for discharging the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened as to JosephWeis and he be let into a defense. The judgment was regularly confessed by an attorney at law upon a bond, with warrant of attorney, dated March 4, 1909, duly signed, sealed and delivered by August Weis and JosephWeis, the defendants. The bond contained the following:
“Now the condition of this Obligation is such, that if the above bounden August Weis shall and will from time to time, and at all times hereafter for and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Liederkranz Singing Society v. Turn-VereinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Jacobosky v. ZborowjanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Camp of Penna. of Patriotic Sons of America v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- McCreary Tire & Rubber Co. v. Piccone, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County1929