Legal Opinion
United States v. Grinnell Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 24, 1969No. 65 Civ. 2486PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
The federal government, plaintiff in this antitrust damage action, moves for a determination that the defendants are collaterally estopped from litigating the issue of defendants’ violation of the antitrust laws. All the defendants herein have previously been found to have violated §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, in an enforcement action brought by the government. United States v. Grinnell Corp., 236 F.Supp. 244 (D.C.R.I.1964), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 384 U.S. 563, 86 S.Ct. 1698, 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966).
The instant suit is brought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Winters v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Winters v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. American Heart Research Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.