Turney v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The appellant, a Florida resident, brought this action to reform a $20,000 note and mortgage given to him by the appellees, Wayne Roberts and his wife, Hazel Bishop Roberts. Reformation was sought upon the allegations of fraud and other inequitable conduct on the part of the Robertses. Appellant Turney also sought foreclosure and subrogation as to a previous encumbrance (Denham) on the real property. The Robertses admitted execution of the note and mortgage and interposed usury as á defense. Subsequently, cross-appellee Richardson filed an intervention alleging that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Arnett v. LillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Stephenson v. GrantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Cowling v. BrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Hervey v. College of the OzarksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beach Associates, Inc. v. FauserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DidierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Klotz v. KlotzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
- Virginia Falls v. UtleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Acklin v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.