Legal Opinion

Beach Associates, Inc. v. Fauser

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 18, 1980PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

The plaintiff borrowers brought an action in the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 271, § 49(c), requesting that the judge declare void a loan which they obtained from the defendant lenders. The defendants extended this loan at a rate of interest which exceeded the limit established by G. L. c. 271, § 49(a). The judge declined to void the loan and entered a judgment reforming the mortgage note by reducing the stated interest rate to the maximum permissible limit. The plaintiffs argue that the loan was void and that the judge was powerless to reform the mortgage note. We affirm the judgment.

T…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Lawrence v. FalzaranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Dzuris v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Powers, Inc. v. Wayside, Inc. of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Greenleaf Finance Co. v. SMALL LOANS REGULATORY BOARDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Boulter-Hedley v. BoulterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Continental Mortg. Investors v. Sailboat Key, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API