Legal Opinion

Muhlenberg County v. Dyer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1895No. 261PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe District of Kentucky.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court of tbe United States for tbe district of Kentucky, awarding a peremptory writ of mandamus. Tbe writ ran against D. J. Fleming and others, members of tbe funding board of Mublen: berg county, and required them to make and enter an order on their records directing Louis Reno, treasurer of Muhlenberg county, to *635pay $9,970.48, the amount admitted by him to be in his hands, less §1,000 for expenses, to the relators below, Dyer and Gíllett, as a credit upon the amount due to them on a judgment recovered by them in the same…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Stringfellow v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Hayes v. FischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States Ex Rel. Crawford v. AddisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Walker v. DrevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delta Nat. Bank v. EasterbrookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904
  2. Board of Councilmen of City of Frankfort v. Deposit Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. City of Cleveland v. United States ex rel. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. United States v. Diamond Match Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Jabine v. OatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API