City of Cleveland v. United States ex rel. Cunningham
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
This is the third time in which the controversy in this case has, in one form or another, been before this court. In the case as reported in 98 Fed. 657, 39 C. C. A. 211, the receiver of the Cleveland Water & Electric Light Company sought, and by the award of this court recovered, a judgment against the city of Cleveland, a municipality of Tennessee, for the sum of $9,852.12, as damages for the refusal of the city to perform a contract with the Water & Electric Light Company for the supplying of water and light to the city and its inhabitants. Pursuant to the mandate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Smith v. Bourbon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States Ex Rel. Crawford v. AddisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Cunningham v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- City of Cleveland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913
- Cunningham v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907