Legal Opinion

Edwardson v. Hansen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. S. F. No. 8843PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of partial distribution of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree of partial distribution. The only appellants are the four children of decedent’s deceased sister, Anna Mathieson, residents of the kingdom of Denmark, who claim that under a writing admitted to probate as the last will of decedent they are entitled to all of the estate of deceased except two legacies of five hundred dollars each. The lower court concluded that such writing was insufficient as a will or otherwise to dispose of the estate of decedent except as to the said two legacies, and that as to all of the estate over one thousand dollars so disposed of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of AkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Estate of KarkeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API