Legal Opinion
Rose v. K. K. Masutoku Toy Factory Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1979No. 77-1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal granted in favor of Masutoku Toy Factory Company and Masudaya Toy Company, Ltd., on the basis that personal jurisdiction had not been obtained against them and that the statute of limitations barred the suit.
The memorandum opinion and order entered September 8, 1977, set forth the reasons in support of the trial court’s final judgment entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
On January 27, 1977, the appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Howard v. Jenny's Country Kitchen, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Bill Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Rose v. K. K. Masutoku Toy Factory CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979