Legal Opinion

John A. Henneberger v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1968No. 71-67PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKELTON, Judge.

The plaintiff, John A. Henneberger, filed suit in this case for $2,000, more or less, which he alleges he is entitled to under the provisions of the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952, as amended. The facts on which he bases his claim are as follows:

The plaintiff served as a commissioned officer (Lieutenant, junior grade) of the United State Naval Reserve under what is known as an active duty agreement from February 19, 1957, until September 13, 1964. On May 22, 1964, he wrote a letter to the Chief of Naval Personnel in which he requested that he be offered an active duty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Ludzinski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Prichard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Ethel Cohen, of the Estate of Harry L. Cohen, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Dorl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Buchanan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Hanes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Mansell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API