Legal Opinion
Dorl v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1973No. 444-70PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkeltoN, Judge
The plaintiff, Boland Dorl, was a member of the enlisted reserve in the United States Air Force, not on active duty, when he was offered an appointment as a captain subject to his agreement to retain Beady Beserve status and be assigned to a Beady Beserve unit. He accepted the appointment on *629May 18,1964, and was assigned to tlie 26th. Air Division as of May 11, 1964, with availability classification AA. He executed the Eeady Eeserve agreement on June 3, 1967, to expire June 1, 1968.
Plaintiff was given six Officer Efficiency Eeports (OEEs) from May 11, 1964, to November 3, 1967. The first two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Stephens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Patrick F. X. McGucken v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Marcus A. Arnheiter v. John H. Chafee, U.S. Secretary of the Navy, Does One Through Ten, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- James W. Clinton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Kenneth L. Wronke v. John A. Marsh, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Cooper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Grieg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.