Legal Opinion

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Chestman, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1988No. 369, Docket 88-6171PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves intervention under Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P., by the government into a civil case solely for the purpose of seeking a stay of discovery in that case pending completion of a criminal investigation concerning the same underlying facts. The district court denied intervention as of right under Rule 24(a) but granted permissive intervention under Rule 24(b). It then stayed discovery. Defendant, who has now been indicted, has appealed from the grant of intervention. Alternatively, he seeks a writ of mandamus vacating the order granting intervention. We dismiss the appeal for lack of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Bess MyersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Twenty First Century Corp. v. LaBiancaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Ashworth v. Albers Medical, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
  3. Javier H. v. Garcia-BotelloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. NicholasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  5. Ali v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API