State v. Malvern
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellees Mark Daniel Davis and Stacy Malvern were charged with first-degree hindering prosecution in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2512(A) for rendering assistance to Daryl, a juvenile who had absconded from a state juvenile secure care facility. Davis pled guilty to attempted first-degree hindering prosecution, and Malvern moved to dismiss the charge. Concluding that § 13-2512 only proscribes assistance to a person who has committed a felony, and that, as a juvenile, Daryl could only commit delinquent acts rather than felonies, the trial court granted Malvern’s motion to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GetzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- KZPZ Broadcasting, Inc. v. Black Canyon City Concerned CitizensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen MatlockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Harris, Wilson, Angel Team Home Care v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.