Legal Opinion

State v. Malvern

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 9, 1998No. 2 CA-CR 97-0335, 2 CA-CR 97-0433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellees Mark Daniel Davis and Stacy Malvern were charged with first-degree hindering prosecution in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2512(A) for rendering assistance to Daryl, a juvenile who had absconded from a state juvenile secure care facility. Davis pled guilty to attempted first-degree hindering prosecution, and Malvern moved to dismiss the charge. Concluding that § 13-2512 only proscribes assistance to a person who has committed a felony, and that, as a juvenile, Daryl could only commit delinquent acts rather than felonies, the trial court granted Malvern’s motion to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. GetzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. KZPZ Broadcasting, Inc. v. Black Canyon City Concerned CitizensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen MatlockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Harris, Wilson, Angel Team Home Care v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API