Orange, S.A. v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Orange, S.A. and several of its employees (collectively, Orange) ask this court to issue a writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 directing the district court to (1) vacate its order denying Orange’s motion to dismiss and (2) direct an entry of judgment dismissing Telesocial, Inc.’s (Telesocial) First Amended Complaint (FAC). We have jurisdiction pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and decline to issue the writ. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we have “jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts.” Special Investments,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Swift Transportation Co. v. United States District Court for District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Yan Guo v. Kyani, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Swift Transportation Co. v. United States District Court for District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- (HC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.