Legal Opinion
Swift Transportation Co. v. United States District Court for District of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2016No. 15-70592PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge HURWITZ;
Dissent by Judge IKUTA
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this companion case to Van Dusen v. Swift, No. 15-15257 (“Van Dusen III”), Swift Transportation Company, Inc., Interstate Equipment Leasing, Inc., and senior executives at both companies (collectively “Swift”) seek a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to vacate its case man*915agement order and decide the petition to compel arbitration without discovery or trial. We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
I
The factual background of this case is set forth in some detail in the opinion in Van Dusen III. In short, two interstate…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Creech v. United States District Court for the District of Idaho, BoiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- High Country Paving, Inc. v. Usdc-MmiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Michael Lacey v. Usdc-AzpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.