Blankenship v. Union Pacific Railroad

Plaintiff has moved and defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion, 87 Or App 410, 742 P2d 680 (1987), where we held, inter alia, that certain evidence offered by plaintiff was irrelevant but that the trial court’s error in admitting the evidence was harmless. We affirmed the judgment for plaintiff. We deny both the petition and the motion. However, the motion requires some comment.

Plaintiff argues that the evidence was relevant, but states that he “does not seek reconsideration of the portion of the opinion which holds that admission of this evidence was harmless error.”…