Legal Opinion

Devi v. Senior & Disabled Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1995No. 6-0611-542-82-1602; CA A85332Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Reconsideration Order of the Senior and Disabled Services Division (SDSD) affirming a Final Order denying petitioner food stamp benefits. We reverse and remand.

The facts are undisputed. Petitioner received food stamp benefits from May 1, 1983, to March 31,1986. On June 24, 1986, petitioner signed a “waiver agreement,” in which she admitted that she had received more benefits than she was entitled to receive and waived the right to contest the imposition of the penalty of disqualification from receipt of food stamp benefits for six months. She executed a confession…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Blankenship v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Garcia v. ConcannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Blankenship v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API