Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1988No. A8502-01021; CA A39775PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals a $1,900,375 judgment for plaintiff, its employe, in this action under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 USC § 51 et seq (1976). We affirm.

Plaintiff suffered a traumatic amputation of both legs when a railroad car struck him while he was clearing snow from a switch in defendant’s railroad yard. Defendant admitted liability. The issue was the amount of general damages. Plaintiff presented evidence of the cost of his future medical treatment and related services, loss of earning capacity and pain and suffering. The evidence included testimony that plaintiffs prosthetic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Blankenship v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Pooschke v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Blankenship v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. McWilliams v. SzymanskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Cote v. NH College, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
  4. State v. Ambriz-ArguelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API