Legal Opinion
Tadsen v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1996No. CC 93-1208-L-2; CA A85428; SC S42765PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
This is an action under ORS 659.121 1 for unlawful employment practices in violation of ORS 659.415 2 and 659.425. 3 Defendant seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming a trial court’s judgment for plaintiff, its former employee. Tadsen v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc., 136 Or App 247, 902 P2d 586 (1995). 4 The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs claim for future lost wages and benefits (“front pay”). 5 For the reasons that follow, we hold that it did not err.
On review of a trial court’s order denying a motion to strike a claim…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Terri L. NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Peters v. Rivers Edge Mining, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.