Forrester v. Flores
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Santa Barbara. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
J.Action in equity for specific performance. By the complaint it is claimed that about March 18, 1880, the defendant was the OAvner of the lot of land in dispute and “agreed ” to sell the same to the plaintiffs for a stipulated price; and, upon payment thereof, to execute and to deliver to the plaintiffs a good and sufficient deed to the land. The plaintiffs aver that they have fully performed the agreement on their part by paying the entire purchase money, but the defendant, although he has taken and kept the money, refuses to execute and deliver his deed to the land.
In his answer the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.