Legal Opinion
Harris v. Bowser
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 1, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2018-0768Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WARREN R. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MURIEL E. BOWSER, et al., Civil Action No. 18-768 (CKK) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 1, 2021) Plaintiff Warren R. Harris (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Harris”) moves this Court for summary judgment in favor of his Fifth Amendment substantive and procedural due process claims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), and further moves to exclude the report and testimony by Defendants’ expert, Mr. Tim Gravette. Defendants Mayor Muriel E. Bowser, Director of the District of Columbia Department…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.