Loomis v. Callahan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentEschweiler, J.
However necessary or praiseworthy the ends reached by the decision in this action may be, or however certain repayment may be, I cannot concur in a decision upholding the means and methods used for obtaining such ends.
No one could successfully contend that the board of regents of the University could have gone to these defendants *530and obtained directly from them loans of these trust funds to the amounts and for the purposes that are being authorized by this decision. A direct loan by the regents would clearly be in violation of the constitutional limitation upon the state’s power to contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camp v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Cunneen v. KalscheuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926