Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loomis v. Callahan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1928Published

1DissentEschweiler, J.

However necessary or praiseworthy the ends reached by the decision in this action may be, or however certain repayment may be, I cannot concur in a decision upholding the means and methods used for obtaining such ends.

No one could successfully contend that the board of regents of the University could have gone to these defendants *530and obtained directly from them loans of these trust funds to the amounts and for the purposes that are being authorized by this decision. A direct loan by the regents would clearly be in violation of the constitutional limitation upon the state’s power to contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camp v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cunneen v. KalscheuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API