Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 25, 1968No. 25398PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Phillips appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of Alabama Credit Corp. Phillips was charged with violations of §§ 12(2), 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 77l(2), 77q, and the Alabama misrepresentation statute, 7 Ala.Code § 108 (1958).1

Phillips claims that fraudulent intent need be proved and that he was entitled to have the jury determine that issue. It is clear that intent need not be proved in § 12(2) and § 17 cases. Wilko v. Swan, 1953, 346 U.S. 427, 431, 74 S.Ct. 182, 184, 98 L.Ed. 168, 173; S.E.C. v. Capital Gaines Research Bureau, 1963, 375 U.S. 180, 192, 195,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. James M. Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corporation D/B/A Fidelity Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Friedman v. Rayovac Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Banton v. HackneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Gridley v. Sayre & Fisher Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1976
  5. Alabama Credit Corporation, D/B/A Fidelity Securities Corporation v. Ruth M. DeasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API