Legal Opinion

Russell v. East Alabama Health Care Authority

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 21, 2015No. 2140075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

One element an invitee must establish to recover against a property owner for an injury caused by the defective condition of the property is that the property owner had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition. Clayton v. Kroger Co., 455 So.2d 844, 845 (Ala.1984). Ruth Russell appeals from a summary judgment entered by thé' Lee Circuit Court' (“the trial court”) in favor of East Alabama Health Care Authority d/b/a'East Alabama Medical Center (“EAMC”) with respect to claims of negligence and wantonness arising from alleged injuries Russell sustained on premises…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Campbell v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. Daniel v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API