Legal Opinion
Croskey Street Concerned Citizens v. George Romney
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 25, 1972No. 71-2129Published
1Opinion of the Court
459 F.2d 109
CROSKEY STREET CONCERNED CITIZENS, Lyra Fortune, on her own
behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Appellants,
Resident Advisory Board of Philadelphia, (Intervening Plaintiff),
v.
George ROMNEY, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.
No. 71-2129.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued March 10, 1972.
Decided April 25, 1972.
Edwin D. Wolf, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Robert J. Sugarman, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for intervening plaintiff.
Walter S. Batty, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.