Legal Opinion

In Re Bare Escentuals, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2010No. C 09-3268 PJHPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

The individual defendants’ and the underwriter defendants’ motions to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion to strike came on for hearing before the court on July 21, 2010. Lead plaintiffs Westmoreland County Retirement System and Vincent J. Takas, on behalf of certain purchasers of Bare Escentuals’ common stock (collectively “plaintiffs”), appeared through their counsel, Mary Blasy. Defendant Bare Escentuals, Inc. (“Bare” or “the Company”), along with numerous individual defendants 1 (all collectively…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rieckborn v. Jefferies LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. McCarthy v. BrennanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Mallen v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
  5. City of Miami Gen. Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Ret. Trust v. RH, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API