Blankenburg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 334, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co,, June T., 1909, No. 609, dismissing bill in equity in case of Rudolph Blankenburg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company. Bill in equity for the specific performance of a contract and for an injunction. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Elkin,
The question involved here under the circumstances *340of this case is purely academic because the merits of the controversy have been considered and determined in another proceeding involving the same questions between the city of Philadelphia and the defendant company. In that case it has just been decided that the question raised is ruled by Philadelphia v. Rapid Transit Co., 224 Pa. 544. It may be assumed that what appellant and all other interested parties desire is that the rights of the contracting parties under the contract between the city and the transit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Greensburg, Jeannette & Pittsburg Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Easton Transit Co.'s PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Gingrich v. Blue Ridge Memorial GardensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Passyunk Avenue Business Men's Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- American Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. Grant Building, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.