Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Sonoma v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1985No. S.F. 24377PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

The issue presented by this case is the constitutionality of provisions in Public Resources Code section 25531 for judicial review exclusively by this court of certain decisions of the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) pertaining to construction projects for which the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) must issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity.1 We shall conclude that the statutory provisions are a proper exercise of the Legislature’s broad powers over matters within the purview of the PUC.

*364The Warren-Alquist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API