Legal Opinion

Vassault v. Austin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

The plaintiff brought his action of ejectment against Austin and his wife for a lot of land in San Francisco, with which he united a suit in equity against them and one Mansfield Compton, the object of which was to obtain a decree of the Court declaring certain conveyances investing Mrs. Austin with the title to said land fraudulent and void, and further declaring that she had no interest in the premises as against the plaintiff, and enjoining her perpetually from setting up or claiming any right, title or interest therein. From the part of the complaint setting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humphreys v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Curnow v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Roussin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Cowie v. AhrenstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kirstein v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API