Cowie v. Ahrenstedt
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from. Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
Plaintiffs obtained a judgment against C. Kavanaugh and Charles Roberts for certain brick alleged to have been sold and delivered to them, and also obtained a decree of foreclosure of a lien alleged to have been claimed and filed upon the leasehold interest of the defendant, W. H. Cowie, in a certain brick building in the construction of which, it was alleged, said bricks were used. From the judgment and decree thus entered defendants Cowie and Roberts have appealed, and the case is before us on a transcript of the record and a statement of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vassault v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Proulx v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Fairhaven Land Co. v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Steel v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.