Legal Opinion
Schoenberg v. Romike Properties
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1967No. Civ. 29270; Civ. 30531PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J. *
In this action Axel and Mildred Schoenberg were awarded $117,500 as damages for fraud and negligence in the sale of plaintiffs’ real property to Jack Casey and wife Hilda. The judgment was against the Caseys, against Romike Properties, a corporation, a real estate broker, and George Albert Pratt, Mary Ellen Benner and Pauline Bell Witte who were salesmen of Romike Properties in its brokerage business. In addition plaintiffs were awarded judgment of $7,500 against Romike Properties, which the broker had received as a commission. Only Romike and Benner appeal from the judgment.
After…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Lopez v. Emergency Service Restoration, Inc. (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Alexander v. Abbey of the ChimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.