Legal Opinion
Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 14, 2006No. 03 C 2934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., moves to compel the defendants to produce documents identifying their non-U.S. sales of modular jacks, which Murata claims infringe its patent. The patent-in-suit, Murata’s '641 patent, is directed to a modular jack of the kind used in computers and similar electronic devices. The jack has an integrated noise suppression feature designed to reduce the adverse effects of an extraneous electromagnetic field or signal. Murata alleges that Bel Fuse: (1) is making, using, selling, importing…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Acevedo v. Ace Coffee Bar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Warrior Sports, Inc. v. Dickinson Wright, P.L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Julie Wright v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.