Legal Opinion

Warrior Sports, Inc. v. Dickinson Wright, P.L.L.C.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 10, 2009No. 09-12102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.

On June 10, 2009, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause in this legal malpractice action directing Plaintiff Warrior Sports, Inc. (“Warrior”) to show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Both Warrior and Defendant Dickinson Wright, P.L.L.C. (“Dickinson Wright”) filed answers to the order on June 22, 2009, arguing that federal subject matter jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1338.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Warrior Sports,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Roof Technical Services, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
Genelink Biosciences, Inc. v. ColbyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010