Legal Opinion
Neyland v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1985No. 12046PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court sustaining an administrative appeal brought pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes §§ 4-166 through 4-189. The trial court found that the plaintiff, a nontenured school teacher in the town of Redding, had not been accorded the procedural protections required by the UAPA and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment when the defendant board of education decided not to renew her contract of employment for the 1975-76 school year. We hold that the UAPA was inapplicable to the board’s action and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.