Legal Opinion
Albany Insurance v. Rose-Tillmann, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 31, 1995No. Civ. 94-517-JOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:
This is an insurance coverage dispute. Ross Bros. Construction Inc. (“Ross Bros”), a construction contractor, brought this diversity action against its insurance agent, Rose-Tillmann, Inc. (“Rose-Tillmann”), and its insurer, Albany Insurance Company (“Albany”), after Albany denied Ross Bros’ claim for loss sustained to a mobile crane in February 1994.
Rose-Tillmann, the agent, in turn, filed a third-party complaint against PWS Group Ltd. (“PWS Group”), PWS North America Ltd. (“PWS North”), and B.A.T. Insurance Services, Inc. (“BAT”), the other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. The Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Lewis-Williamson v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002