Legal Opinion
Payne v. Bell
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 15, 2000No. 98-2963 Ml/BrePublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION AND. SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND FOR SUPPORT SERVICES
McCALLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery and Supplemental Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery and for Support Services. The Court will consider these two motions together. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART these motions. 1
I. Background
Petitioner seeks several types of discovery for a variety of different purposes. In his Motion for leave to Conduct Discovery…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burns v. LaflerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Hall v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Keenan v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Sample v. ColsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Sanborn v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.