Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2011No. 35055PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This ease comes before this Court on a permissive appeal from two interlocutory orders ((1) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioner’s Supplemental Motion for Discovery and, (2) Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Juror Contact) that were entered by the district court while capital post-conviction proceedings were pending for Erick Virgil Hall. Hall argues that the district court erred in prohibiting post-conviction contact with the jurors who deliberated in the underlying criminal ease, and in denying Hall’s motion for a court-ordered deposition of his trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API