Legal Opinion

Dickenson v. Babich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, C.J.

This is an action wherein plaintiff recovered damages against the defendant for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s wife. From the judgment entered the defendant appeals.

Constructive service of summons was had upon the defendant by publication, as provided in ORS 15.140. The defendant appeared specially and moved to set aside the service had upon him. The trial court denied the defendant’s motion and the defendant assigns this as error.

The action was commenced on December 29, 1953, and summons for personal service was placed in the hands of the sheriff of Marion county on December 30,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lang v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Decker v. WimanOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API