Legal Opinion

Lann v. Hill

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1977No. CIV-76-0684-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This is an action in which Plaintiffs seek recovery based on the alleged negligence of a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) inspector, an employee of the United States of America, in his appraisal of a home Plaintiffs purchased. 1 Plaintiffs assert that this Court has jurisdiction of the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346. Pursuant to Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss. Said Motion is supported by a Brief and Plaintiffs have filed a Brief in opposition thereto.

In support of their Motion to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. TWT Exploration Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Weiss v. SawyerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Jordan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Lawser v. Poudre School District R-1District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  5. Brown v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API