Jordan v. United States
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOHANON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of Defendant, United States of America (“Government”), to dismiss the above-entitled action on two separate grounds. First, the government argues that Plaintiffs’ complaint fails to satisfy the jurisdictional prerequisites of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. In addition, the government contends that Plaintiffs’ assault and battery claim is not cognizable under the FTCA. After carefully examining Defendant’s motion and brief, Plaintiffs’ response thereto, and Defendant’s reply…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mitchell v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Christine Roth Melo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Joanne Bembenista v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Chodos v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Crespo Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000